The Tea Party Patriots claim to have some 60,000 registed members



FRONT PAGE
Site Search
About us |
Quiénes somos |
A propos de nous | Über uns |
Mayor Monitor
Directories
Events
Debate


Tea Party Patriots
Vision for metro America
Power relations in US cities
US cities fight back
US 2011 mayoral elections
US clergy and local politics
US politcs and consumerism
US elections 2010: Results
Obamas' urban policies
Mayors in the White House
Politically neglected US cities
US mayors


City Mayors reports news from towns and cities around the world. Worldwide | Elections | North America | Latin America | Europe | Asia | Africa |


City Mayors ranks the world’s largest, best as well as richest cities and urban areas. It also ranks the cities in individual countries, and provides a list of the capital cities of some 200 sovereign countries. More


City Mayors profiles city leaders from around the world. More


City Mayors describes the history, architecture and politics of the greatest city halls in the world. More


Mayors from The Americas, Europe. Asia, Australia and Africa compete for the World Mayor Award. More


Use
Mayor Monitor to rate the performance of mayors from across the world More


In your opinion: Praise Criticise. Write


City Mayors reports political events, analyses the issues and depicts the main players. More


City Mayors describes and explains the structures and workings of local government in Europe, The Americas, Asia, Australia and Africa. More


City Mayors deals with economic and investment issues affecting towns and cities. More


City Mayors describes and explains financial issues affecting local government. More


City Mayors reports urban environmental developments and examines the challenges faced by cities worldwide. More


City Mayors reports on and discusses urban development issues in developed and developing countries. More


City Mayors reports on developments in urban society and behaviour and reviews relevant research. More


City Mayors invites readers to write about the people in their cities. More


City Mayors examines city brands and marketing. More


City Mayors lists and features urban events, conferences and conventions aimed at urban decision makers and those with an interest in cities worldwide. More



City Mayors deals with urban transport issues in developed and developing countries and features the world’s greatest metro systems. More


City Mayors examines education issues and policies affecting children and adults in urban areas. More


City Mayors investigates health issues affecting urban areas with an emphasis on health in cities in developing countries. More


City Mayors reports on how business developments impact on cities and examines cooperation between cities and the private sector. More


City Mayors examines the contributions history and culture make to urban society and environment. More


City Mayors examines the importance of urban tourism to city economies. More


City Mayors questions those who govern the world’s cities and talks to men and women who contribute to urban society and environment. More


City Mayors profiles national and international organisations representing cities as well as those dealing with urban issues. More


City Mayors reports on major national and international sporting events and their impact on cities. More


City Mayors lists cities and city organisations, profiles individual mayors and provides information on hundreds of urban events. More

Tea Party Patriots appeal to
Small-Town White America

By Tony Favro, US Editor

20 February 2010: Small groups of fiscal and social conservatives in the United States began meeting in Spring 2009 under the moniker of Tea Parties -- the Chicago Tea Party, Kentucky Tea Party, and so on -- to organize small, but vocal local protests against big government and high taxes. The groups were loosely coordinated by Internet websites and promoted by right-wing radio and television talk show hosts. Their name is intended to invoke the 1773 Boston Tea Party revolt of the American colonists against English taxation without representation, a pivotal event leading to the American Revolution.

| Racial codes and anger | Historical antecedents | Rights, freedoms and consequences |

The current Tea Party Patriots, as they refer to themselves, want a second American revolution to fight what they perceive is a ruling class in Washington that is unresponsive to their needs. The Tea Party movement gained national prominence in September 2009 when a march of local Tea Party groups on Washington, DC attracted, by some estimates, as many as two million people. The first Tea Party national convention in February 2010 was covered by network television in the US.

A distinguishing feature of the Tea Party movement has become the reliance of its leaders on racial codes to communicate. Although race is rarely mentioned overtly, Tea Party supporters press racial hot buttons to provoke the anger of conservative whites over race and the cities where most racial minorities live.

Racial codes and anger
President Barack Obama has become a target of Tea Party outrage. Popular placards at the national convention featured photos of the President with captions like, “Undocumented Alien” and “The zoo has an African lion, and the White House has a lyin’ African.”

The opening speaker at the Tea Party national convention, former Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo, told participants that President Obama was elected because “we do not have a civics, literacy test before people can vote in this country,” an allusion to the use of literacy tests in Southern states to deny the vote to African-Americans before the civil rights era.

Most Tea Partiers – there are an estimated 19 million – are whites who seem to have come of age during the 1960s, but did not participate in civil rights or other countercultural movements of the era. Indeed, a pre-civil rights era before dramatic social and cultural change seems to be a well of inspiration to Tea Party members.

Conservative Pat Buchanan writes, “Immigrants are 21 per cent of the uninsured, but only 7 per cent of the population. This means white folks on Medicare or headed there will see benefits curtailed, while new arrivals from the Third World, whence almost all immigrants come, get taxpayer-subsidized health insurance… Any wonder all those Tea Party protests seem to be made up of angry white folks?”

At the national convention, keynote speaker Sarah Palin (former mayor, former governor, former vice-presidential candidate) warned attendees that “government is on your back” and “you should keep your money,” insinuating that “high taxes” for public services are wasted on “illegals” and minorities. Race, in other words, simmers just below the surface of seemingly nonracial issues like health care reform, public spending, immigration, and taxes.

At a Tea Party rally in Kentucky, local Republican Congressman Geoff Davis called proposed federal cap-and-trade legislation designed to protect the environment “economic colonization of the hardworking states that produce the energy, the food, and the manufactured goods of the heartland, to take that and pay for social programs in the large coastal states.”

In Tea Party code, “heartland” often means “white” – what Palin calls “the real America” – while “coastal state” refers to urbanized communities with high proportions of racial minorities that also serve as “gateways” for Latino immigrants. The standard bearers of the Tea Party movement (mostly right-wing commentators and conservative Republican politicians) want no less than to portray economic liberalism and the government social safety net as a fraud perpetrated by a Washington ruling class against self-sufficient, small-town whites who are forced to pay an unfair amount of taxes to support the welfare queens and food stamp cheats in the big cities and coastal states.

It doesn’t seem to matter to Tea Partiers that a disproportionately high share of the federal government’s tax revenue comes not from the “heartland” states but from racially-diverse, immigrant-rich, highly-urbanized states like New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California.

Historical antecedents
The Tea Party movement is a direct descendent of the anti-tax, segregationist politics that swept the southern United States in the 1950s and 1960s. It is a politics of “tax cutting,” “privatization,” “free enterprise,” and “individual freedom” that -- thanks primarily to former Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush – remains extremely popular in America’s white outer suburbs and exurbs.

American middle-class whites repeatedly express conflicting desires in opinion polls: they want more government services, but lower taxes; a federal job-creation program, but federal spending cuts; universal health care, but fewer government regulations. Above all, they believe that everyone is getting a handout from government – politicians, labor, business, minorities, cities, immigrants, foreign countries – except them.

Reagan and Bush exploited white middle class confusion and, through radical laissez faire economic policies, turned it into rage. Bush’s 2006 budget was subtitled Blueprint for the Middle Class, yet it set the stage for a global recession, record unemployment levels, and the Tea Party reaction. 

Rights, freedoms and consequences
According to its website, “Tea Party Nation is a user-driven group of like-minded people who desire our God given individual freedoms which were written out by the Founding Fathers.”

The freedoms desired by Tea Partiers include the freedom to love money, zone neighborhoods, and protest taxes. They are individual freedoms divorced from the common good. The appeals of Tea Party stalwarts to suburban and exurban whites, who feel threatened by cultural and economic change are populist and racist. Such a mixture is incendiary and caustic, with consequences that are unknowable. Perhaps we should not be surprised that the Boston Globe reported that President Obama received an unprecedented number of death threats during in his first year in office, or that the Justice Department reported an escalation in race-motivated crimes last year.

According to recent polls, most Americans regard the Tea Partiers as fringe activists, removed from the mainstream. Whatever traction the movement gains, however, will likely be at the expense of cities and the people who live in them.

Comment on this article
Read comments




Sarah Palin, former mayor, Alascan governor and vice-presidential candidate has become the idol of the Tea Party movement


Also by Tony Favro
American cities debate
English-only legislation

In June 2009, Albertville, Alabama (pop. 24,000) became the latest US city to pass an ordinance making English the city’s official language.  Albertville Mayor Lindsay Lyons maintains the ordinance will be “a unifying factor,” bringing together immigrants and English speakers.  “It will greatly enhance” the quality of immigrants’ lives, says Lyons, by encouraging them to learn English.

At least 30 US cities, including Hazelton, Pennsylvania (pop. 23,000) and Green Bay, Wisconsin (pop. 102,000), have adopted English-only legislation.  Hazelton Mayor Louis Barletta credits the law for a drop in the number of illegal immigrants moving to his city. 

English-only legislation is closely tied to the debate over illegal immigration in the US.  An estimated 11 million illegal immigrants, mostly from Mexico and Central America, reside in the United States.  How to deal with these undocumented workers and their families has frustrated US policymakers for years.  Proposed remedies range from legalization to deportation of illegal immigrants.  Within the context of this debate, the movement for English-only laws arose.  These laws declare that all official actions of the government must be conducted in English. 

Nashville, Tennessee (pop. 600,000) illustrates the contours of the debate.  In 2007, then-Mayor Bill Purcell vetoed an English-only bill passed by the Nashville Metro Council, saying the ordinance would make the city “less safe, less friendly, and less successful.” 

Backers of the Nashville bill argued that it would save city taxpayers the expense of printing government materials in several languages or be required to pay interpreters.  They further argued that government must encourage immigrants to join mainstream society and not live in linguistic isolation. More