Mercer Consulting has named Vienna as the 'best city' in the world.



FRONT PAGE
Site Search
About us





EIU: Best cities in the world
Mercer: Best cities in the world

Richest cities in the world
Secure cities
Urban population growth from now to 2030
World's largest cities
and their mayors 2010

Most expensive world cities


Worldwide | Elections | North America | Latin America | Europe | Asia | Africa |





























The best cities in the world for
environment and infrastructure

A report by Mercer Consulting

6 December 2012: Vienna has again been named as the ‘best city’ in the world, with the Austrian capital’s perennial Swiss rival, Zurich, in second place. Auckland, Munich and Vancouver complete the top five. Overall, German-speaking cities, including Düsseldorf, Frankfurt and Bern, occupy six places in the top ten of this year’s Quality of Living Survey by Mercer Consulting. Paris is ranked 29th, London 38th and New York City 44th. Singapore, Frankfurt and Munich offer the best infrastructure.

• Top ranked cities
• The Americas
• Europe
• Asia-Pacific
• Middle East & Africa
• Cities with the best infrastructure
• Research methodology

This year’s Mercer research separately identifies the cities with the best infrastructure based on electricity supply, water availability, telephone and mail services, public transportation, traffic congestion and the range of international flights from local airports. Singapore is at the top of this index, followed by Frankfurt and Munich in second place. Copenhagen (4) and Dusseldorf (5) fill the next two slots, while Hong Kong and London share sixth place. Port-au-Prince (221) ranks at the bottom of the list. The highest-ranking US cities on the city infrastructure list are Atlanta (13), Dallas (15), Washington, DC (22) and Chicago (28).

The world's best cities for quality of life
(New York City is the base city with a score of 100 points)

2012 Rank
2011 Rank
City
Country
1
1
Vienna Austria
2
2
Zurich Switzerland
3
3
Auckland New Zealand
4
4
Munich Germany
5
5
Vancouver Canada
6
=5
Düsseldorf Germany
7
7
Frankfurt Germany
8
8
Geneva Switzerland
9
=9
Copenhagen Denmark
=10
9
Bern Switzerland
=10
11
Sydney Australia
12
12
Amsterdam Netherlands
13
13
Wellington New Zealand
14
14
Ottawa Canada
15
15
Toronto Canada
16
17
Berlin Germany
=17
16
Hamburg Germany
=17
18
Melbourne Australia
=19
19
Luxembourg Luxembourg
=19
20
Stockholm Sweden
21
21
Perth Australia
22
=22
Brussels Belgium
23
=22
Montreal Canada
24
24
Nürnberg Germany
25
25
Singapore Singapore
26
=26
Canberra Australia
27
28
Stuttgart Germany
28
29
Honolulu USA
=29
=30
Adelaide Australia
=29
=30
Paris France
=29
=30
San Francisco USA
=32
=33
Calgary Canada
=32
35
Helsinki Finland
=32
=33
Oslo Norway
=35
36
Boston USA
=35
=26
Dublin Ireland
37
37
Brisbane Australia
38
38
London UK
39
39
Lyon France
40
40
Barcelona Spain
41
42
Milan Italy
42
=43
Chicago USA
43
=43
Washington DC USA
=44
41
Lisbon Portugal
=44
47
New York City USA
=44
48
Seattle USA
=44
46
Tokyo Japan
48
=49
Kobe Japan
=49
=43
Madrid Spain
=49
=49
Pittsburgh USA
=49
=49
Yokohama Japan
Research by Mercer Consulting

The EIU's list of 'best' cities in the world



The Americas
Canadian cities still dominate the top of the index for this region, with Vancouver (5) retaining the top regional spot, followed by Ottawa (14), Toronto (15) and Montreal (23). Calgary ranks 32 on the overall quality of living ranking. Overall, there was almost no movement in rankings among Canadian cities from 2011 to 2012, with Calgary advancing one position, Montreal retreating one position, and the other cities remaining unchanged.
 
Honolulu (28) is the US city with the highest quality of living, followed by San Francisco (29) and Boston (35). Chicago is at 42 and Washington, DC ranks 43. New York – the base city – ranks 44. In Central and South America, Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe ranks the highest for quality of living at 63. San Juan, Puerto Rico follows at 72 and Montevideo, Uruguay at 77. Port-au-Prince, Haiti (219) ranks lowest in the region.
 
A spokesman for Mercer said: “Overall, there has been little change in the rankings for North American cities. A number of South and Central American countries have experienced positive change, essentially due to some modest infrastructural and recreational improvement. Nevertheless, political and security issues, along with natural disasters, continue to hamper the quality of living in South and Central American cities. High crime levels also remain a major problem.”
 
In terms of city infrastructure, Vancouver (9) tops the ranking for the region with Atlanta and Montreal following at 13. Other Canadian cities that ranked highly were Toronto (16) and Ottawa (25). In the United States, Dallas ranked 15, followed by Washington, DC (22), Chicago (28) and New York (30). Buenos Aires, Argentina (83) has the best city infrastructure in Central and South America, whereas Port-au-Prince is the lowest ranking at 221.

Europe
Europe has 15 cities among the world’s top 25 cities for quality of living. Vienna retains the highest-ranking for both the region and globally. The rest of the top 10 for Europe are dominated by German and Swiss cities, with three cities each in the top 10. Zurich (2) is followed by Munich (4), Düsseldorf (6), Frankfurt (7), Geneva (8), Copenhagen (9) and Bern (10). The lowest-ranking Western European cities are Athens (83) and Belfast (64). Apart from London, there are no UK cities in the top 50.
 
Other European cities among the top 25 include Amsterdam (12), Berlin (16), Hamburg (17), Luxembourg (19), Stockholm (19), Brussels (22) Nürnberg (24) and Stuttgart (27). Paris ranks 29 and is followed by Helsinki (32), Oslo (32) and London (38). Dublin dropped nine places from last year to rank 35, mostly due to a combination of serious flooding and an increase in crime rates. Lisbon ranks 44 followed by Madrid (49) and Rome (52). Prague, Czech Republic (69) is the highest-ranking Eastern European city followed by Budapest, Hungary (74); Ljubljana, Slovenia (75); Vilnius, Lithuania (79); and Warsaw, Poland (84). The lowest-ranking European city is Tbilisi, Georgia (213).

With six cities in the top 10, European cities also fare well in the city infrastructure ranking. Frankfurt and Munich rank the highest at second place, followed by Copenhagen (4) and Düsseldorf (5). London (6) and Hamburg (9) are followed by Paris which ranks 12. Budapest (67) is the highest-ranking for city infrastructure in Eastern Europe followed by Vilnius (74) and Prague (75), whereas Yerevan (189) and Tbilisi (201) rank lowest.
 
“Infrastructure in German and Danish cities is among the best in the world, in part due to their first-class airport facilities, international and local connectivity, and a high standard of public services,” said Mr. Parakatil. “London’s high ranking in the infrastructure index reflects a combination of high level of public services offered, with its extensive public transportation system including airports, the London Underground buses and railroad services.”


Asia-Pacific
Auckland (3) retains its position as the highest-ranking city for quality of living in the region. Sydney follows at 10, Wellington at 13, Melbourne at 17 and Perth at 21. Singapore remains the highest-ranking Asian city at 25 followed by Japanese cities Tokyo (44), Kobe (48), Yokohama (49) and Osaka (57). Hong Kong (70), Seoul (75), Kuala Lumpur (80), Taipei (85) and Shanghai (95) are other major Asian cities ranked in the top 100. The region’s lowest-ranking cities are Dhaka, Bangladesh (203); Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan (204); and Dushanbe, Tajikistan (207).
 
For city infrastructure, Singapore has the highest ranking worldwide followed by Hong Kong (6), Sydney (8), Perth (25), Tokyo (32) and Melbourne (34). Adelaide and Brisbane both ranked 37. Nagoya (41), Auckland (43), Kobe (44), Wellington (48), Seoul (50) and Osaka (51) are the next highest-ranking cities in this region. The region’s lowest-ranking city for city infrastructure is Dhaka, Bangladesh (205).
 
According to Mercer, a noticeable gap can be seen among Asia Pacific cities where several cities have improved in the region partly because they have been investing massively in infrastructure and public services. "Competition among municipalities has been continuously increasing in order to attract multinationals, foreigners, expatriates and tourists. Yet a considerable number of Asian cities rank in the bottom quartile, mainly due to high political volatility, poor infrastructure and obsolete public services,” a spokesman said.

Middle East and Africa
Dubai (73) and Abu Dhabi (78) in the United Arab Emirates are the region’s cities with the best quality of living. Port Louis in Mauritius (82), Cape Town (89) and Johannesburg (94) follow, and along with Victoria in the Seychelles (96) and Tel Aviv (99), are the region’s only other cities in the top 100. This region has 15 cities in the bottom 20, including Lagos, Nigeria (202); Bamako, Mali (209); Khartoum, Sudan (217); and N’Djamena, Chad (218). Baghdad, Iraq (221) is the lowest-ranking city both regionally and globally.

In the city infrastructure index, most of the region’s cities rank below 100. The exceptions are Dubai (34), which ranks the highest in the region for city infrastructure, Tel Aviv (58), Abu Dhabi (72), Port Louis (91), Muscat (94), Cairo (95) and Cape Town (97). Port Louis, Cairo and Cape Town are the only African cities in the top 100. Elsewhere in the region, Doha, Qatar is at 102, Tunis, Tunisia, ranks 103 and Manama, Bahrain is at 110. In terms of city infrastructure, Baghdad, Iraq (220) is the lowest-ranking city regionally, along with Sana’a, Yemen (219); Brazzaville, Congo (218); Kigali, Rwanda (217); and Abuja, Nigeria (215).
 
“The ongoing turmoil in many countries across North Africa and the Middle East has led to serious security issues for locals and expatriates,” said a spokesman for Mercer. “Many countries continue to experience violence through political demonstrations that have sometimes developed into massive uprisings and led to serious instability within the region. Countries such as Syria and Mali have seen their quality of living levels drop substantially.”


The cities with the best infrastructure
Rank
City
Country
1
Singapore Singapore
2
Frankfurt Germany
2
Munich Germany
4
Copenhagen Denmark
5
Düsseldorf Germany
=6
Hong Kong Hong Kong
=6
London UK
8
Sydney Australia
=9
Hamburg Germany
=9
Vancouver Canada
11
Yokohama Japan
12
Paris France
=13
Atlanta, GA USA
=13
Montreal Canada
15
Dallas USA
=16
Toronto Canada
=16
Vienna Austria
=18
Helsinki Finland
=18
Oslo Norway
=18
Stockholm Sweden
=18
Stuttgart Germany
22
Washington DC USA
23
Amsterdam Netherlands
24
Zurich Switzerland
=25
Bern Switzerland
=25
Ottawa Canada
=25
Perth Australia
28
Chicago USA
29
Berlin Germany
30
New York City USA
31
Boston USA
32
Tokyo Japan
33
Nurnberg Germany
=34
Dubai UAE
=34
Madrid Spain
=34
Melbourne Australia
=37
Adelaide Australia
=37
Brisbane Australia
=37
Philadelphia USA
40
Honolulu USA
41
Nagoya Japan
42
Brussels Belgium
43
Auckland New Zealand
=44
Birmingham UK
=44
Glasgow UK
=44
Kobe Japan
47
Geneva Switzerland
48
Miami, FL USA
48
Wellington New Zealand
50
Seoul South Korea
Research by Mercer Consulting




Research methodology
Mercer Consulting largely between September and November 2012 and is regularly updated to take account of changing circumstances. In particular, the assessments are revised in the case of significant political, economic and environmental developments.

Mercer evaluates local living conditions in all the 460 cities it surveys worldwide. Living conditions are analysed according to 39 factors, grouped in 10 categories:
1) Political and social environment (political stability, crime, law enforcement, etc)
2) Economic environment (currency exchange regulations, banking services, etc)
3) Socio-cultural environment (censorship, limitations on personal freedom, etc)
4) Health and sanitation (medical supplies and services, infectious diseases, sewage, waste disposal, air pollution, etc)
5) Schools and education (standard and availability of international schools, etc)
6) Public services and transportation (electricity, water, public transport, traffic congestion, etc)
7) Recreation (restaurants, theatres, cinemas, sports and leisure, etc)
8) Consumer goods (availability of food/daily consumption items, cars, etc)
9) Housing (housing, household appliances, furniture, maintenance services, etc)
10) Natural environment (climate, record of natural disasters)

The scores attributed to each factor allow for city-to-city comparisons. The result is a quality-of-living index that compares relative differences between any two locations. For the indices to be used effectively, Mercer has created a grid that allows users to link the resulting index to a quality-of-living allowance amount by recommending a percentage value in relation to the index.




World Mayor 2023